Masaaki Konishi*, Junichi Ishida, Jochen Springer, Stefan D. Anker, Stephan von Haehling
Article first published online: 12 APR 2016
Even though most clinical data on cachexia have been reported from Western countries, cachexia may be a growing problem in Asia as well, as the population in this area of the world is considerably larger. Considering the current definitions of obesity and sarcopenia in Japan, which are different from the ones in Western countries, the lack of a distinct cachexia definition in Japan is strinking. Only one epidemiological study has reported the prevalence of cachexia using weight loss as part of the definition in patients with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer. Although the reported prevalence of 45.6% is within the range of that in Western countries (28–57% in advanced cancer), we cannot compare the prevalence of cachexia in other types of cancer, heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and kidney disease (CKD) between Japan and Western countries. In patients with heart failure, one third of Japanese patients has a body mass index <20.3 kg/m2 whereas the prevalence of underweight is 13.6% in reports from Western countries. These results may suggest that there are more cachectic heart failure patients in Japan, or that using the same definition like Western countries leads to gross overestimation of the prevalence of cachexia in Japan. The rate of underweight patients in COPD has been reported as 31–41% in COPD and seems to be high in comparison to the prevalence of cachexia in Western countries (27–35%). The reported lowest quartile value of BMI (19.6 kg/m2) in CKD may match with the prevalence of cachexia in Western countries (30–60%). The number of clinical trials targeting cachexia is very limited in Japan so far.
Cachexia is a complex metabolic syndrome associated with underlying illness, characterized by loss of muscle with or without loss of fat mass, and clinically diagnosed by the criteria including existence of underlying chronic disease, significant weight loss, and several evidences of abnormal metabolism. Because of the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases associated with the development of cachexia in advancing age, there is a large number of cachexia-related hospitalizations with increasing costs in Western countries. Although most clinical data on cachexia have been reported from Western countries, cachexia may be a growing problem because of the larger population in Asia as well.
As the definition of cachexia includes body weight, we have to pay attention to the fact that the body size in Asian people is different from that in Western countries because of difference in diet, lifestyle, and metabolism. For example, the cutoff value of the body mass index (BMI) for the definition of obesity is smaller in Japan than in Western countries (≥25 kg/m2 in Japan and ≥30 kg/m2 in Western countries). Hence, there is still some possibility that not only the prevalence but also the ideal therapeutic strategies are different between in Asian people and Caucasians. Research results in Japan as an Asian aged country could become more important both for Asia and western countries.
Although the researchers in Asia have proposed an Asian definition for sarcopenia, which includes different cutoff values of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance than that for Western countries,[6, 7] there has been no distinct Asian definition for cachexia so far. A simple quotation from the global definition of cachexia has been included in the Clinical Guidelines for Infusion Therapy in Advanced Cancer Patients 2013 edited by the Japanese Society for Palliative Medicine, which is the only one cachexia definition with a cutoff for weight loss in Japan. No other definition of cachexia is shown in guidelines for chronic diseases such as heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or chronic kidney disease (CKD). Regarding heart failure, unintentional weight loss is alerted as cachexia in Guidelines for Treatment of Acute Heart Failure. For COPD patients, nutritional evaluation including weight assessment are recommended in a section of ‘Nutrition management’ in the guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of COPD (3rd edition) without referring to cachexia itself. In CKD guidelines, continual diet therapy is recommended without referring to cachexia itself. Lack of distinct cachexia definitions in Japan does not necessarily mean that researchers have accepted the global definition but may rather suggest that many researchers have not paid much attention to cachexia. In fact, there seems to be only one epidemiological research study reporting the prevalence of cachexia using weight loss as a part of the definition. Kimura et al. retrospectively reviewed the clinical data of consecutive patients with stage III or IV non-small cell lung cancer who had received their first-line chemotherapy, after having excluded those who were candidates for curative radiotherapy or who had received palliative radiotherapy. Cachexia, defined as a body weight loss >5% over the past 6 month or >2% in patients with a BMI <20 kg/m2, was observed in 45.6% of the overall cohort, and its presence was associated with a poor prognosis. Although this number is within the range of Western countries (the prevalence ranging from 28 to 57% in advanced cancer and 50–80% in several types of cancer), we cannot compare the prevalence of cachexia in other types of cancer, heart failure, COPD, and CKD between Japan and Western countries. Hence, here we listed epidemiologic researches ‘suggesting’ the prevalence of cachexia, which includes BMI data in chronic diseases (Table 1). In recent years, a significant amount of data has been updated. However, many of these reports[16-21] had criteria including only BMI cut-off of 18.5 kg/m2, which is related to the World Health Organization definition of ‘malnutrition’. Table 1 includes the data with tertile or quantile value of BMI, if the value is close to 20 kg/m2, which is one of the criteria in universal cachexia definition. The lack of data with regards to weight loss in most of the listed reports may be because of the fact that such data cannot be assembled from many databases in retrospect, if the researchers did not record the history of weight loss at the beginning of the studies. According to the epidemiologic data with BMI, one-thirds of Japanese heart failure patients had a BMI <20.3 kg/m2 whereas the prevalence of underweight (BMI <20.7 kg/m2) was 13.6% in reports from Western countries. These data may suggest that there are more cachectic heart failure patients in Japan than in Western countries, or that the use of the same definition as in Western countries can overestimate the prevalence of cachexia in Japan. Although direct comparisons between Japan and Western countries cannot be performed either in CKD and COPD, the reported lowest quartile value of BMI (19.6 kg/m2) in CKD may match the prevalence of Western countries (30–60%). In COPD, the rate of low BMI (<20 kg/m2) and underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) patients were 41% and 31%, which seem to be high in comparison with the prevalence of cachexia in Western countries (27–35%).Epidemiologic researches suggesting the prevalence of cachexia
|Disease||Inclusion criteria||Exclusion criteria||Reference||Definition used||N||Prevalence (%)|
|Cancer||Advanced NSCLC planned to CT||Patients planned to radiotherapy||Kimura et al. 2015 ||Cachexia||Weight loss >5% over 6 month or >2% in patients with a BMI <20 kg/m2||134||46|
|Head and neck cancer||None||Takenaka et al. 2014 ||Underweight||BMI <18.5 kg/m2||726||18|
|Breast cancer planned to CT and surgery||Distant metastasis||Iwase et al. 2014 ||Underweight||BMI <18.5 kg/m2||248||7|
|Stomach cancer||None||Minami et al. 2015 ||Underweight||BMI <18.5 kg/m2||1033||8|
|Chronic HF||Stable HF||None||Nochioka et al. 2010 ||Underweight||BMI <18.5 kg/m2||972||9|
|Hospitalized HF||Acute CVD, dialysis, cancer||Takiguchi et al. 2014 ||Underweight||BMI <18.5 kg/m2||648||13|
|Hospitalized HF||None||Hamaguchi et al. 2010 ||Lower tertile in BMI||BMI <20.3 kg/m2||2488||(33)|
|Hospitalized HF||AMI, dialysis, cardiac surgery||Komukai et al. 2012 ||Lowest quartile in BMI||BMI ≤21.4 kg/m2||219||(25)|
|CKD||Hemodialysis||Acute CVD, active infection, cancer||Takahashi et al. 2012 ||Lowest quartile in BMI||BMI <19.6 kg/m2||1228||(25)|
|COPD||Stable COPD||Tuberculosis, cancer||Higashimoto et al. 2011 ||Low BMI||BMI <20 kg/m2||69||41|
|Hospitalized COPD (>65 y)||None||Yamauchi et al. 2014 ||Underweight||BMI <18.5 kg/m2||263 940||31|
As expected by the lack of epidemiologic data in cachexia, most of observational/interventional studies in Japan have been based on various definitions for cachexia. Table 2 shows observational/interventional parallel-group comparison studies using some clear definitions for cachexia. There are wide difference among studies in the definition of cachexia, although some of them have taken weight loss into account as part of the definition.[27-33] Four interventional studies using ghrelin and octanoic acid-rich formula have been reported in the field of COPD, including two studies with weight loss >7.5% over 6 months[32, 33] and 2 studies with BMI <21 kg/m2[34, 35] as the definition of cachexia. On the other hand, there is no published interventional research targeting cachexia in cancer, heart failure, and CKD. Most of the studies in cancer and heart failure focused on blood levels of hormones or cytokines in those with and without cachexia, but used definitions for cachexia that are completely different from each other. Two of them did not include body weight, but only included cancer stage or blood markers as definitions of cachexia. The other studies in cancer had an endpoint of weight loss and inflammatory responses[38, 39] without any definition of cachexia. The reasons for such a wide variety of inclusion criteria are not clear, but it could be speculated that the researchers intended to simplify the enrollment of patients. Although the number of clinical trials targeting cachexia is very limited in Japan so far, researchers may have a potential to produce more evidence in this field, having fruitful results as their background especially in the field of basic research. Further studies targeting cachexia patients defined by universal criteria are desirable when we consider to apply the results for Western countries.Observational and interventional studies for cachexia and definitions
|Disease||Classification||Reference||Definition of cachexia||Study endpoints||Type of study||N|
|Cancer||Colorectal and gastric cancer||Shibata et al. 2002 ||Recurrence or metastasis and >5% weight loss over 3 months or alb <3.0 g/dL||The production of cytokines by peripheral blood mononuclear cells||Observational||61|
|Lung cancer||Shimizu et al. 2003 ||Weight loss >5% over 3 month||Plasma ghrelin levels||Observational||43|
|Gastric cancer||Takahashi et al. 2009 ||Stage IV, subjective symptoms||Plasma ghrelin and leptin levels||Observational||16|
|Any cancers||Naito et al. 2012 ||GPS as a continuous scale||Oxycodone metabolism||Observational||47|
|Pancreatic cancer||Fujiwara et al. 2014 ||Performance Status >0, anorexia, and weight loss >10% over 6 months||Serum metabolite levels||Observational||21|
|Any cancers||Suno et al. 2015 ||Weight loss >5% over 6 month or >2% in patients with a BMI <20 kg/m2 or with sarcopenia||Dose-adjusted plasma fentanyl concentrations||Observational||21|
|Chronic HF||Stable HF||Nagaya et al. 2001 ||Weight loss >7.5% over 6 month||Plasma levels of ghrelin and other cytokines||Observational||74|
|COPD||COPD||Ashitani et al. 2009||Weight loss >7.5% over 6 month or BMI <21 kg/m2||The effect of an octanoic acid-rich formula on plasma acyl-ghrelin levels||Interventional||23|
|COPD||Nagaya et al. 2005 ||Weight loss >7.5% over 6 month||The effects of ghrelin on body composition, muscle strength, and functional capacity||Interventional||7|
|COPD||Miki et al. 2012 ||BMI <21 kg/m2||The efficacy and safety of adding ghelin to pulmonary rehabilitation||Interventional||33|
|COPD||Matsumoto et al. 2015 ||BMI <21 kg/m2||The optimal dose of ghrelin||Interventional||44|
In recent years, many epidemiological data have been updated reporting the distribution of BMI in chronic diseases in Japan, however, most of them have not referred to the definition of cachexia. The clinical course and background of cachectic patients in Japan may be different from that of patients in Western countries. There have been several observational studies comparing patients with and without cachexia, but the definitions of cachexia used have widely varied among studies. Interventional clinical trials for cachectic patients are still lacking especially in cancer, heart failure, and CKD. Further studies are needed to assess the epidemiologic/pathological background, as well as the effect of therapeutic approach, in cachexia.
The authors have read and certified that they comply with the ethical guidelines for authorship and publishing in the Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia, and Muscle.